[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57036dad-d9b8-4f06-8083-af7ed8c42035@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 21:06:42 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...7.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: thead: ensure divisor gives
proper rate
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:15:17PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> thead was checking that the stmmac_clk rate was a multiple of the
> RGMII rates for 1G and 100M, but didn't check for 10M. Rather than
> use this with hard-coded speeds, check that the calculated divisor
> gives the required rate by multplying the transmit clock rate back
> up to the stmmac clock rate and checking that it agrees.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists