lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250224143430.5fa61a68@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:34:30 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Heib <mheib@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: Clear old fragment checksum value in
 napi_get_frags

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:14:05 +0200 Mohammad Heib wrote:
> In certain cases, napi_get_frags() returns an skb that points to an old
> received fragment, This skb may have its skb->ip_summed, csum, and other
> fields set from previous fragment handling.
> 
> Some network drivers set skb->ip_summed to either CHECKSUM_COMPLETE or
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY when getting skb from napi_get_frags(), while
> others only set skb->ip_summed when RX checksum offload is enabled on
> the device, and do not set any value for skb->ip_summed when hardware
> checksum offload is disabled, assuming that the skb->ip_summed
> initiated to zero by napi_get_frags.
> 
> This inconsistency sometimes leads to checksum validation issues in the
> upper layers of the network stack.
> 
> To resolve this, this patch clears the skb->ip_summed value for each skb
> returned by napi_get_frags(), ensuring that the caller is responsible
> for setting the correct checksum status. This eliminates potential
> checksum validation issues caused by improper handling of
> skb->ip_summed.

Could you give an example of a driver where this may happen?
Otherwise the commit message reads too hypothetical.

> Fixes: 76620aafd66f ("gro: New frags interface to avoid copying shinfo")
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib <mheib@...hat.com>
> ---
>  net/core/gro.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/gro.c b/net/core/gro.c
> index 78b320b63174..e98007d8f26f 100644
> --- a/net/core/gro.c
> +++ b/net/core/gro.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,8 @@ struct sk_buff *napi_get_frags(struct napi_struct *napi)
>  			napi->skb = skb;
>  			skb_mark_napi_id(skb, napi);
>  		}
> +	} else {
> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
>  	}
>  	return skb;
>  }

I think this belongs in napi_reuse_skb(), doesn't it ?

Please make sure you CC maintainers on v2, especially Eric.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ