[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250224143430.5fa61a68@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:34:30 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Heib <mheib@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: Clear old fragment checksum value in
napi_get_frags
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:14:05 +0200 Mohammad Heib wrote:
> In certain cases, napi_get_frags() returns an skb that points to an old
> received fragment, This skb may have its skb->ip_summed, csum, and other
> fields set from previous fragment handling.
>
> Some network drivers set skb->ip_summed to either CHECKSUM_COMPLETE or
> CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY when getting skb from napi_get_frags(), while
> others only set skb->ip_summed when RX checksum offload is enabled on
> the device, and do not set any value for skb->ip_summed when hardware
> checksum offload is disabled, assuming that the skb->ip_summed
> initiated to zero by napi_get_frags.
>
> This inconsistency sometimes leads to checksum validation issues in the
> upper layers of the network stack.
>
> To resolve this, this patch clears the skb->ip_summed value for each skb
> returned by napi_get_frags(), ensuring that the caller is responsible
> for setting the correct checksum status. This eliminates potential
> checksum validation issues caused by improper handling of
> skb->ip_summed.
Could you give an example of a driver where this may happen?
Otherwise the commit message reads too hypothetical.
> Fixes: 76620aafd66f ("gro: New frags interface to avoid copying shinfo")
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib <mheib@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/core/gro.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/gro.c b/net/core/gro.c
> index 78b320b63174..e98007d8f26f 100644
> --- a/net/core/gro.c
> +++ b/net/core/gro.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,8 @@ struct sk_buff *napi_get_frags(struct napi_struct *napi)
> napi->skb = skb;
> skb_mark_napi_id(skb, napi);
> }
> + } else {
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> }
> return skb;
> }
I think this belongs in napi_reuse_skb(), doesn't it ?
Please make sure you CC maintainers on v2, especially Eric.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists