netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] selftests/net: big_tcp: return xfail on slow machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250225102436.GT1615191@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:24:36 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Pablo Martin Medrano <pablmart@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] selftests/net: big_tcp: return xfail on slow
 machines

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 06:34:55PM +0100, Pablo Martin Medrano wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pablo,
> >
> > FWIIW, I think this can be moved to below the scissors ("---").
> >
> > Checkpatch complains that fixes tags should have 12 or more characters of
> > sha1 hash.
> >
> > Fixes: a19747c3b9bf ("selftests: net: let big_tcp test cope with slow env")
> 
> Thank you Simon! I will modify this for the next version. Looks like I am
> falling in all the stones possible for my first patch :) Receiving such a
> friendly support is great.

Perhaps there are too many stones :)

> > Lastly, and most importantly, it seems that there is new feedback on a
> > predecessor of this patch, which probably needs to be addressed.
> 
> Addressing it. Thank you for pointing it out!