netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] netconsole: add configfs controls for taskname sysdata feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7309e760-63b0-4b58-ad33-2fb8db361141@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:41:50 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] netconsole: add configfs controls for
 taskname sysdata feature

On 2/21/25 2:52 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Add configfs interface to enable/disable the taskname sysdata feature.
> This adds the following functionality:
> 
> The implementation follows the same pattern as the existing CPU number
> feature, ensuring consistent behavior and error handling across sysdata
> features.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/netconsole.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index 1b109f46512ffb7628c6b34c6efdfc301376dd53..5a29144ae37ee7b487b1a252b0f2ce8574f9cefa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -426,6 +426,20 @@ static ssize_t sysdata_cpu_nr_enabled_show(struct config_item *item, char *buf)
>  	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", cpu_nr_enabled);
>  }
>  
> +/* configfs helper to display if taskname sysdata feature is enabled */
> +static ssize_t sysdata_taskname_enabled_show(struct config_item *item,
> +					     char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct netconsole_target *nt = to_target(item->ci_parent);
> +	bool taskname_enabled;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dynamic_netconsole_mutex);
> +	taskname_enabled = !!(nt->sysdata_fields & SYSDATA_TASKNAME);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dynamic_netconsole_mutex);
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", taskname_enabled);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * This one is special -- targets created through the configfs interface
>   * are not enabled (and the corresponding netpoll activated) by default.
> @@ -841,6 +855,40 @@ static void disable_sysdata_feature(struct netconsole_target *nt,
>  	nt->extradata_complete[nt->userdata_length] = 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t sysdata_taskname_enabled_store(struct config_item *item,
> +					      const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct netconsole_target *nt = to_target(item->ci_parent);
> +	bool taskname_enabled, curr;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtobool(buf, &taskname_enabled);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dynamic_netconsole_mutex);
> +	curr = nt->sysdata_fields & SYSDATA_TASKNAME;

Minor nit:
	curr = !!(nt->sysdata_fields & SYSDATA_TASKNAME);

would be preferable, and more robust if later on other SYSDATA_ bits are
added, 'moving down' SYSDATA_TASKNAME definition.

Also it would be more consistent with previous usage in
`sysdata_taskname_enabled_show()`

Cheers,

Paolo