[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250227094800.7ff48a71@fedora.home>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:48:00 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 08/12] net: ethtool: try to protect all
callback with netdev instance lock
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:11:04 -0800
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me> wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> Protect all ethtool callbacks and PHY related state with the netdev
> instance lock, for drivers which want / need to have their ops
> instance-locked. Basically take the lock everywhere we take rtnl_lock.
> It was tempting to take the lock in ethnl_ops_begin(), but turns
> out we actually nest those calls (when generating notifications).
>
> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
> ---
> drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c | 2 --
> net/dsa/conduit.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> net/ethtool/cabletest.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> net/ethtool/cmis_fw_update.c | 7 ++++++-
> net/ethtool/features.c | 6 ++++--
> net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 6 ++++++
> net/ethtool/module.c | 8 +++++---
> net/ethtool/netlink.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> net/ethtool/phy.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> net/ethtool/rss.c | 2 ++
> net/ethtool/tsinfo.c | 9 ++++++---
> net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 5 ++++-
> 12 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
FWIW I've tested that patchset with various PHY-related ethtool ops as
well as the module ops and didn't notice any issue or strangeness.
So to some extent,
Tested-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Thanks,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists