[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55ddacb9-dc00-4477-aeab-9b8861563194@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:18:02 +0800
From: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>,
Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/6] net: pcs: xpcs: re-initiate clause 37
Auto-negotiation
On 26/2/2025 11:40 pm, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 03:48:33PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-wx.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-wx.c
>> index fc52f7aa5f59..f73ab04d09f0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-wx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-wx.c
>> @@ -172,11 +172,9 @@ int txgbe_xpcs_switch_mode(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, phy_interface_t interface)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - if (xpcs->interface == interface && !txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk(xpcs))
>> + if (!txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk(xpcs))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - xpcs->interface = interface;
>> -
>
> ...
>
>> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
>> @@ -602,12 +602,37 @@ static void xpcs_get_interfaces(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, unsigned long *interfaces)
>> __set_bit(compat->interface, interfaces);
>> }
>>
>> +static int xpcs_switch_interface_mode(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
>> + phy_interface_t interface)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (xpcs->interface != interface) {
>> + if (xpcs->info.pma == WX_TXGBE_XPCS_PMA_10G_ID) {
>> + ret = txgbe_xpcs_switch_mode(xpcs, interface);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> The above modification changes the functionality.
>
> In the old code, txgbe_xpcs_switch_mode() does its work when
> xpcs->interface is not the same as interface OR txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk()
> is true.
>
> Your replacement code calls txgbe_xpcs_switch_mode() when
> xpcs->interface is not the same as interface, *and* it can do its
> work when txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk() returns true.
>
> So, e.g. when txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk() returns false, but the interface
> changes, txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk() used to do its work, but as a result
> if your changes, it becomes a no-op.
>
> The point of txgbe_xpcs_mode_quirk() is to always do the work if it
> returns true, even if the interface mode doesn't change.
>
> Therefore, this patch is logically incorrect, and likely breaks TXGBE.
>
Thank you for pointing out the oversight. I will review the logic and make
the necessary corrections to ensure the patch does not disrupt the expected
behavior.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists