[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92442281-9896-4271-a040-0c14331cb1d3@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 23:27:57 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] net: stmmac: call phylink_start() and
phylink_stop() in XDP functions
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:05:02PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Phylink does not permit drivers to mess with the netif carrier, as
> this will de-synchronise phylink with the MAC driver. Moreover,
> setting and clearing the TE and RE bits via stmmac_mac_set() in this
> path is also wrong as the link may not be up.
>
> Replace the netif_carrier_on(), netif_carrier_off() and
> stmmac_mac_set() calls with the appropriate phylink_start() and
> phylink_stop() calls, thereby allowing phylink to manage the netif
> carrier and TE/RE bits through the .mac_link_up() and .mac_link_down()
> methods.
>
> Note that RE should only be set after the DMA is ready to avoid the
> receive FIFO between the MAC and DMA blocks overflowing, so
> phylink_start() needs to be placed after DMA has been started.
Sorry, i don't know enough about XDP to review this :-(
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists