[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250303175358.4e9e0f78@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 17:53:58 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>, Aron Silverton
<aron.silverton@...cle.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Itay Avraham <itayavr@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Jonathan
Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Leonid Bloch <lbloch@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Introduce fwctl subystem
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:26:28 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> v5:
> - Move hunks between patches to make more sense
> - Rename ucmd_buffer to fwctl_ucmd_buffer
> - Update comments and commit messages
> - Copyright to 2025
> - Drop bxnt WIP patches
> - Allow a NULL ops->info
> - Decode more op codes for mlx5 and the sub-operation for
> MLX5_CMD_OP_ACCESS_REG/_USER
Did you address my feedback? I asked for the mlx5 support to only be
enabled in RDMA is in use. Saeed who wrote the mlx5 parts of this
patchset clearly admitted on v4:
As explained above, netdev doesn't need it
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z6ZsOMLq7tt3ijX_@x130/
Greg, I've been asking for this interface to be scoped to when RDMA
(/CXL/storage) is in enabled on these NICs since pretty much the first
RFC. Do I need to keep responding?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists