[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305185052.GA354403@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:50:52 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: longli@...uxonhyperv.com
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [patch rdma-next v3 1/2] net: mana: Change the function
signature of mana_get_primary_netdev_rcu
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:00:01PM -0800, longli@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
>
> -struct net_device *mana_get_primary_netdev_rcu(struct mana_context *ac, u32 port_index)
> +struct net_device *mana_get_primary_netdev(struct mana_context *ac, u32 port_index)
> {
> struct net_device *ndev;
>
> - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(),
> - "Taking primary netdev without holding the RCU read lock");
> if (port_index >= ac->num_ports)
> return NULL;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> /* When mana is used in netvsc, the upper netdevice should be returned. */
> if (ac->ports[port_index]->flags & IFF_SLAVE)
> ndev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(ac->ports[port_index]);
> else
> ndev = ac->ports[port_index];
>
> + dev_hold(ndev);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
That's much better, yes
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists