[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250305182118.3d885f0d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:21:18 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mkarsten@...terloo.ca,
gerhard@...leder-embedded.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, mst@...hat.com, leiyang@...hat.com, Eugenio
PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "open
list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS" <virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>, open
list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio-net: Map NAPIs to queues
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 17:42:35 -0800 Joe Damato wrote:
> Two spots that come to mind are:
> - in virtnet_probe where all the other netdev ops are plumbed
> through, or
> - above virtnet_disable_queue_pair which I assume a future queue
> API implementor would need to call for ndo_queue_stop
I'd put it next to some call which will have to be inspected.
Normally we change napi_disable() to napi_disable_locked()
for drivers using the instance lock, so maybe on the napi_disable()
line in the refill?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists