lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bb21136-83e8-4eff-b8f7-dc4af70c2199@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:20:58 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs



On 06/03/2025 4:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 20:55:15 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> 
> Too late, take it via your tree, please.
> You need to respond within 24h or take the patches.

Never heard of a 24h rule. Not clear to me what rule you're talking 
about, what's the rationale behind it, and where it's coming from.

It's pretty obvious for everyone that responding within 24h cannot be 
committed, and is not always achievable.

Moreover, this contradicts with maintainer-netdev.rst, which explicitly 
aligns the expected review timeline to be 48h for triage, also to give 
the opportunity for more reviewers to share their thoughts.

Tariq.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ