[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174124876418.4824.8589202932419197412@kwain>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 09:12:44 +0100
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
To: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org, jdamato@...tly.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-sysfs: fix NULL pointer dereference
Quoting Qasim Ijaz (2025-03-06 00:53:07)
> Commit <79c61899b5ee> introduces a potential NULL pointer dereference
> in the sysfs_rtnl_lock() function when initialising kn:
>
> kn = sysfs_break_active_protection(kobj, attr);
>
> The commit overlooks the fact that sysfs_break_active_protection can
> return NULL if kernfs_find_and_get() fails to find and get the kernfs_node
> with the given name.
If it fails to get it, should we let sysfs_rtnl_lock continue is
execution?
> Later on the code calls sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn)
> unconditionally, which could lead to a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Resolve this bug by introducing a NULL check before using kn
> in the sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() call.
Did you see this in practice? Can you describe what led to this?
Thanks!
Antoine
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>
> Fixes: 79c61899b5ee ("net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock from device attributes")
> ---
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> index 8d9dc048a548..c5085588e536 100644
> --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ static int sysfs_rtnl_lock(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> * the rtnl lock.
> */
> unbreak:
> - sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn);
> + if (kn)
> + sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn);
> dev_put(ndev);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists