[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250307-vsock-trans-signal-race-v1-1-3aca3f771fbd@rbox.co>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 10:27:50 +0100
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Subject: [PATCH net] vsock/bpf: Handle EINTR connect() racing against
sockmap update
Signal delivered during connect() may result in a disconnect of an already
TCP_ESTABLISHED socket. Problem is that such established socket might have
been placed in a sockmap before the connection was closed. We end up with a
SS_UNCONNECTED vsock in a sockmap. And this, combined with the ability to
reassign (unconnected) vsock's transport to NULL, breaks the sockmap
contract. As manifested by WARN_ON_ONCE.
Ensure the socket does not stay in sockmap.
WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 1310 at net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c:90 vsock_bpf_recvmsg+0xb4b/0xdf0
CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 1310 Comm: a.out Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc4+
sock_recvmsg+0x1b2/0x220
__sys_recvfrom+0x190/0x270
__x64_sys_recvfrom+0xdc/0x1b0
do_syscall_64+0x93/0x1b0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Fixes: 634f1a7110b4 ("vsock: support sockmap")
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 10 +++++++++-
net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 7742a9ae0131310bba197830a241541b2cde6123..e5a6d1d413634f414370595c02bcd77664780d8e 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1581,7 +1581,15 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
if (signal_pending(current)) {
err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
- sk->sk_state = sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? TCP_CLOSING : TCP_CLOSE;
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+ /* Might have raced with a sockmap update. */
+ if (sk->sk_prot->unhash)
+ sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
+
+ sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSING;
+ } else {
+ sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
+ }
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
vsock_remove_connected(vsk);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
index 07b96d56f3a577af71021b1b8132743554996c4f..c68fdaf09046b68254dac3ea70ffbe73dfa45cef 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static void vsock_bpf_rebuild_protos(struct proto *prot, const struct proto *bas
{
*prot = *base;
prot->close = sock_map_close;
+ prot->unhash = sock_map_unhash;
prot->recvmsg = vsock_bpf_recvmsg;
prot->sock_is_readable = sk_msg_is_readable;
}
---
base-commit: b1455a45afcf789f98032ec93c16fea0facdec93
change-id: 20250305-vsock-trans-signal-race-d62f7718d099
Best regards,
--
Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists