netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ahh3ctzo2gs5zwwhzq33oudr4hmplznewczbfil74zddfabx4n@t7lwrx6eh4ym>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 13:35:28 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, 
	leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, 
	Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: Fill out devlink dev info only for PFs

Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:43:55PM +0100, kuba@...nel.org wrote:

[...]


>nvidia's employees patches should go via your tree, in the first place.

Why? I've been in Mellanox/Nvidia for almost 10 years and this is
actually the first time I hit this. I'm used to send patches directly,
I've been doing that for almost 15+ years and this was never issue.
Where this rule is written down? What changed?