lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8sn7b_ra_QnWUjw@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 17:07:57 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/3] net: stmmac: approach 2 to solve EEE
 LPI reset issues

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:11:19PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On 06/03/2025 15:23, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is a second approach to solving the STMMAC reset issues caused by
> > the lack of receive clock from the PHY where the media is in low power
> > mode with a PHY that supports receive clock-stop.
> > 
> > The first approach centred around only addressing the issue in the
> > resume path, but it seems to also happen when the platform glue module
> > is removed and re-inserted (Jon - can you check whether that's also
> > the case for you please?)
> > 
> > As this is more targetted, I've dropped the patches from this series
> > which move the call to phylink_resume(), so the link may still come
> > up too early on resume - but that's something I also intend to fix.
> > 
> > This is experimental - so I value test reports for this change.
> 
> 
> The subject indicates 3 patches, but I only see 2 patches? Can you confirm
> if there are 2 or 3?

Yes, 2 patches is correct.

> So far I have only tested to resume case with the 2 patches to make that
> that is working but on Tegra186, which has been the most problematic, it is
> not working reliably on top of next-20250305.

To confirm, you're seeing stmmac_reset() sporadically timing out on
resume even with these patches appled? That's rather disappointing.

Do either of the two attached diffs make any difference?

Thanks for testing!

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

View attachment "stmmac-block-rx-clk-stop.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (1098 bytes)

View attachment "stmmac-block-rx-clk-stop-2.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (1304 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ