[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z88riPwuTvnAy-cj@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:12:24 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] property: Add functions to iterate named child
Moi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:55:53PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Please note, the checkpatch.pl was not happy about the for_each...()
> macros. I tried to make them to follow the existing convention. I am
> open to suggestions how to improve.
checkpatch.pl isn't always handling macros as well as it might. (It's just
hard to parse C using regular expressions and in practice some
simplifications end up being made.)
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists