[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20f34718-e60f-4361-9ad7-311d3f67e40b@stanley.mountain>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:00:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mediatek: Fix bit field in
mtk_set_queue_speed()
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:27:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Michal Kubiak wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 01:48:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > This was supposed to set "FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_WEIGHT, 1)"
> > > but there was typo and the | operation was missing and which turned
> > > it into a no-op.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f63959c7eec3 ("net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: implement multi-queue support for per-port queues")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > From static analysis, not tested.
> > >
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> > > index 922330b3f4d7..9efef0e860da 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> > > @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static void mtk_set_queue_speed(struct mtk_eth *eth, unsigned int idx,
> > > case SPEED_100:
> > > val |= MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_EN |
> > > FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_MAN, 1) |
> > > - FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_EXP, 5);
> > > + FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_EXP, 5) |
> > > FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_WEIGHT, 1);
> > > break;
> > > case SPEED_1000:
> >
> >
> > There's a similar bug a few lines above (line #737):
> >
> > case SPEED_100:
> > val |= MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_EN |
> > FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_MAN, 103) |
> > FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_EXP, 3);
> > FIELD_PREP(MTK_QTX_SCH_MAX_RATE_WEIGHT, 1);
> > break;
> >
> > I think it would be reasonable to fix that too in the same patch.
>
> Yes. You're of course correct. I'm trying to figure out why my
> static checker found the one instance and not the other. I will
> send a v2.
Oh... Duh. if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_MT7621)) is false for my config so
first line wasn't reachable.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists