[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <468cfeef-3562-4b04-a2c1-e4000472dc85@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:47:34 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Heiko
Stuebner" <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Kunihiko Hayashi
<hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v2] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Provide FIFO
sizes for DWMAC 1000
On 3/12/2025 9:34 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>
> The DWMAC 1000 DMA capabilities register does not provide actual
> FIFO sizes, nor does the driver really care. If they are not
> provided via some other means, the driver will work fine, only
> disallowing changing the MTU setting.
>
> Provide the FIFO sizes through the driver's platform data to enable
> MTU changes. The FIFO sizes are confirmed to be the same across RK3288,
> RK3328, RK3399 and PX30, based on their respective manuals. It is
> likely that Rockchip synthesized their DWMAC 1000 with the same
> parameters on all their chips that have it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists