netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3] igc: Change Tx mode for MQPRIO offloading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250313133914.oqkaihpsl62bmi7t@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:39:14 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: "Abdul Rahim, Faizal" <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3] igc: Change Tx mode for MQPRIO offloading

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 04:03:57PM +0800, Abdul Rahim, Faizal wrote:
> On 7/3/2025 11:02 pm, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > How do you and Faizal plan to serialize your changes on these flags?
> > You delete IGC_FLAG_TSN_LEGACY_ENABLED and he adds
> > IGC_FLAG_TSN_PREEMPT_ENABLED.
> 
> From what I’ve experienced before, when there’s a conflict like this, the
> Intel maintainer handles it and gets both authors to review the resolution
> (this has happened to both of us before) before they proceed to submit the
> patch.
> 
> But if one patch gets merged first, the other person can just rebase and
> submit a new version ?

Yes, rebasing after the other's patch is merged works just fine. I was
asking if you had decided which one should go in first just to avoid any
ambiguity, but if the answer is 'any', that is also fine.