[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250313094540.GC3061046@ragnatech.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:45:40 +0100
From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Ruud Bos <kernel.hbk@...il.com>,
Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>,
Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Lasse Johnsen <l@...johnsen.me>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/5] renesas: reject PTP_STRICT_FLAGS as
unsupported
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for your work.
On 2025-03-12 15:15:51 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> The ravb_ptp_extts() function checks the flags coming from the
> PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST ioctl, to ensure that future flags are not accepted on
> accident.
>
> This was updated to 'honor' the PTP_STRICT_FLAGS in commit 6138e687c7b6
> ("ptp: Introduce strict checking of external time stamp options.").
> However, the driver does not *actually* validate the flags.
>
> I originally fixed this driver to reject future flags in commit
> 592025a03b34 ("renesas: reject unsupported external timestamp flags"). It
> is still unclear whether this hardware timestamps the rising, falling, or
> both edges of the input signal.
>
> Accepting requests with PTP_STRICT_FLAGS is a bug, as this could lead to
> users mistakenly assuming a request with PTP_RISING_EDGE actually
> timestamps the rising edge only.
>
> Reject requests with PTP_STRICT_FLAGS (and hence all PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2
> requests) until someone with access to the datasheet or hardware knowledge
> can confirm the timestamping behavior and update this driver.
>
> Fixes: 6138e687c7b6 ("ptp: Introduce strict checking of external time stamp options.")
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c
> index 6e4ef7af27bf31ab2aad8e06a65e0ede6046e3c0..b4365906669f3bd40953813e263aeaafd2e1eb70 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_ptp.c
> @@ -179,8 +179,7 @@ static int ravb_ptp_extts(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
> /* Reject requests with unsupported flags */
> if (req->flags & ~(PTP_ENABLE_FEATURE |
> PTP_RISING_EDGE |
> - PTP_FALLING_EDGE |
> - PTP_STRICT_FLAGS))
> + PTP_FALLING_EDGE))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> if (req->index)
>
> --
> 2.48.1.397.gec9d649cc640
>
--
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
Powered by blists - more mailing lists