lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647d3c2-171e-43ea-9329-ea37093f5dec@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:58:18 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: airoha: Validate egress gdm port in
 airoha_ppe_foe_entry_prepare()

> Fix the issue validating egress gdm port in airoha_ppe_foe_entry_prepare
> routine.

A more interesting question is, why do you see an invalid port? Is the
hardware broken? Something not correctly configured? Are you just
papering over the crack?

> -static int airoha_ppe_foe_entry_prepare(struct airoha_foe_entry *hwe,
> +static int airoha_ppe_foe_entry_prepare(struct airoha_eth *eth,
> +					struct airoha_foe_entry *hwe,
>  					struct net_device *dev, int type,
>  					struct airoha_flow_data *data,
>  					int l4proto)
> @@ -224,6 +225,11 @@ static int airoha_ppe_foe_entry_prepare(struct airoha_foe_entry *hwe,
>  	if (dev) {
>  		struct airoha_gdm_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);

If port is invalid, is dev also invalid? And if dev is invalid, could
dereferencing it to get priv cause an opps?

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ