[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17915ef1-d118-4e93-a46e-b63968aaa49b@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:22:43 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/7] bnxt_en: Add devlink support for ENABLE_ROCE
nvm parameter
On 3/10/25 7:31 PM, Michael Chan wrote:
> @@ -1128,6 +1130,32 @@ static int bnxt_dl_nvm_param_set(struct devlink *dl, u32 id,
> return bnxt_hwrm_nvm_req(bp, id, req, &ctx->val);
> }
>
> +static int bnxt_dl_roce_validate(struct devlink *dl, u32 id,
> + union devlink_param_value val,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + const struct bnxt_dl_nvm_param nvm_roce_cap = {0, NVM_OFF_RDMA_CAPABLE,
> + BNXT_NVM_SHARED_CFG, 1, 1};
> + struct bnxt *bp = bnxt_get_bp_from_dl(dl);
> + struct hwrm_nvm_get_variable_input *req;
> + union devlink_param_value roce_cap;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = hwrm_req_init(bp, req, HWRM_NVM_GET_VARIABLE);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
Not blocking this series, but I'm wondering: any special reason to not
fill the extack here? Could possibly be a small follow-up.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists