[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9mcjX08ZmcKhqXu@krikkit>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:17:17 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce per netns packet chains
The patch mostly looks ok to me, except:
2025-03-17, 17:37:42 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> /**
> - * dev_nit_active - return true if any network interface taps are in use
> + * dev_nit_active_rcu - return true if any network interface taps are in use
> + *
> + * The caller must held the RCU lock
typo: s/held/hold/
> *
> * @dev: network device to check for the presence of taps
> */
> -bool dev_nit_active(struct net_device *dev)
> +bool dev_nit_active_rcu(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> - return !list_empty(&net_hotdata.ptype_all) ||
> + return !list_empty(&dev_net_rcu(dev)->ptype_all) ||
> !list_empty(&dev->ptype_all);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_nit_active);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_nit_active_rcu);
>
> /*
> * Support routine. Sends outgoing frames to any network
> @@ -2481,11 +2497,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_nit_active);
>
> void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> - struct list_head *ptype_list = &net_hotdata.ptype_all;
> + struct list_head *ptype_list = &dev_net_rcu(dev)->ptype_all;
> struct packet_type *ptype, *pt_prev = NULL;
> struct sk_buff *skb2 = NULL;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
I can't convince myself that all callers of dev_queue_xmit_nit are
under RCU, specifically coming from drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
(x25_data_transmit). Maybe keep this rcu_read_lock here?
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists