[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d16cf71-ce66-46fd-94b3-5757ef044bd5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 20:30:22 +0100
From: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 nf-next 3/3] selftests: netfilter: Add
conntrack_bridge.sh
On 3/19/25 12:07 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 09:00:33PM +0100, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>> Check conntrack bridge is functional in various vlan setups.
>
> Only conntrack bridge support is tested here, patch 2/3 does not seem
> to be covered :(
>
I should add more details to this description.
I do add the nftables table bridge, chain forward, type filter
and check the counter for ct state established.
Without patch 2/3 this counter does not increase.
I can add more match criteria to the counter next version, to better
check patch 2/3 at l3 (and l4) level.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists