netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] nexthop: Check NLM_F_REPLACE and NHA_ID in rtm_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+=CHm30ZHy8nRHwFAyD+Mu=pz6FPewCgMW_MWDubtdYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 08:07:16 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] nexthop: Check NLM_F_REPLACE and NHA_ID
 in rtm_new_nexthop().

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:09 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> nexthop_add() checks if NLM_F_REPLACE is specified without
> non-zero NHA_ID, which does not require RTNL.
>
> Let's move the check to rtm_new_nexthop().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>