netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250324224537.248800-9-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:34 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	horms@...nel.org,
	sdf@...ichev.me,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent

The NETDEV_UNREGISTER notifier gets called under the ops lock
when device changes namespace but not during real unregistration.
Take it consistently, XSK tries to poke at netdev queue state
from this notifier.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 652f2c6f5674..7bd8bd82f66f 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1848,7 +1848,9 @@ static void call_netdevice_unregister_notifiers(struct notifier_block *nb,
 					dev);
 		call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_DOWN, dev);
 	}
+	netdev_lock_ops(dev);
 	call_netdevice_notifier(nb, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+	netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
 }
 
 static int call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers(struct notifier_block *nb,
@@ -11174,8 +11176,11 @@ static struct net_device *netdev_wait_allrefs_any(struct list_head *list)
 			rtnl_lock();
 
 			/* Rebroadcast unregister notification */
-			list_for_each_entry(dev, list, todo_list)
+			list_for_each_entry(dev, list, todo_list) {
+				netdev_lock_ops(dev);
 				call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+				netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
+			}
 
 			__rtnl_unlock();
 			rcu_barrier();
@@ -11966,7 +11971,9 @@ void unregister_netdevice_many_notify(struct list_head *head,
 		/* Notify protocols, that we are about to destroy
 		 * this device. They should clean all the things.
 		 */
+		netdev_lock_ops(dev);
 		call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+		netdev_unlock_ops(dev);
 
 		if (!dev->rtnl_link_ops ||
 		    dev->rtnl_link_state == RTNL_LINK_INITIALIZED)
-- 
2.49.0