[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-EnSBUR8IM70wmg@shredder>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:35:04 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] nexthop: Convert RTM_{NEW,DEL}NEXTHOP to
per-netns RTNL.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 04:06:45PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Patch 1 - 5 move some validation for RTM_NEWNEXTHOP so that it can be
> called without RTNL.
>
> Patch 6 & 7 converts RTM_NEWNEXTHOP and RTM_DELNEXTHOP to per-netns RTNL.
>
> Note that RTM_GETNEXTHOP and RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET are not touched in
> this series.
>
> rtm_get_nexthop() can be easily converted to RCU, but rtm_dump_nexthop()
> needs more work due to the left-to-right rbtree walk, which looks prone
> to node deletion and tree rotation without a retry mechanism.
Thanks for the series, looks good, but note that dump/get can block when
fetching hardware statistics:
rtm_get_nexthop
nh_fill_node
nla_put_nh_group
nla_put_nh_group_stats
nh_grp_hw_stats_update
blocking_notifier_call_chain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists