lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <IA1PR11MB6170CD38BCB85D9FD1CD9A71BBA72@IA1PR11MB6170.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 03:16:41 +0000
From: "Ren, Jianqi (Jacky) (CN)" <Jianqi.Ren.CN@...driver.com>
To: "Ren, Jianqi (Jacky) (CN)" <Jianqi.Ren.CN@...driver.com>,
        "kovalev@...linux.org" <kovalev@...linux.org>
CC: "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "i.maximets@....org"
	<i.maximets@....org>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "kuniyu@...zon.com" <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5.15] net: defer final 'struct net' free in netns
 dismantle

For 5.10 correct the version number to 5.10-stable tree.

-----Original Message-----
From: jianqi.ren.cn@...driver.com <jianqi.ren.cn@...driver.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 11:10
To: kovalev@...linux.org
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com; i.maximets@....org; kuba@...nel.org; kuniyu@...zon.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; stable@...r.kernel.org; Ren, Jianqi (Jacky) (CN) <Jianqi.Ren.CN@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15] net: defer final 'struct net' free in netns dismantle

We also need this patch for both 5.15 and 5.10. For 5.15 it seems this patch has not been accepted yet. Any reason for that? For 5.10 I saw the patch 41467d2ff4df("net: net_namespace: Optimize the code") as a prerequisite for 0f6ede9fbc74 ("net: defer final 'struct net' free in netns dismantle") is already in the 5.10-stable tree. Would the original patch be accepted in next release?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ