[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250326094245.094cef0d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:42:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] net/rds: Avoid queuing superfluous send and recv
work
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:50:11 +0000 Allison Henderson wrote:
> Thread A: Thread B:
> ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
> Calls rds_sendmsg()
> Calls rds_send_xmit()
> Calls rds_cond_queue_send_work()
> Calls rds_send_worker()
> calls rds_clear_queued_send_work_bit()
> clears RDS_SEND_WORK_QUEUED in cp->cp_flags
> checks RDS_SEND_WORK_QUEUED in cp->cp_flags
But if the two threads run in parallel what prevents this check
to happen fully before the previous line on the "Thread A" side?
Please take a look at netif_txq_try_stop() for an example of
a memory-barrier based algo.
> Queues work on on cp->cp_send_w
> Calls rds_send_xmit()
> Calls rds_cond_queue_send_work()
> skips queueing work on cp->cp_send_w
Powered by blists - more mailing lists