netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] Add xsk_rr an AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250327100853.14bfce4f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:08:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Samiullah Khawaja
 <skhawaja@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 almasrymina@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, jdamato@...tly.com,
 mkarsten@...terloo.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] Add xsk_rr an AF_XDP benchmark to measure
 latency

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:32:32 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > As you said it's benchmarking tool so I feel like it should land in
> > https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples where we have xdpsock that
> > have been previously used for benchmarks.  
> 
> I don't think it matters where the tools live. I'm more interested in
> the general guidance on whether we want to continuously run those tools
> on NIPA (on real HW) and track the numbers. Unfortunately it's gonna put
> extra load on the maintainers in terms of tracking and acting on failures,
> but it feels like it's a good direction in general.

I think we should try. Mina is working on merging the page pool test
AFAIU, this is even easier cause it's just user space, no magic modules
to load.