[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250401225439.2401047-1-edward.cree@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:54:39 +0100
From: <edward.cree@....com>
To: <linux-net-drivers@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
CC: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Kyungwook
Boo <bookyungwook@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Since cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also
ef100_check_design_params() run before efx->net_dev is created;
consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this
point.
Move those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace
netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.
Reported-by: Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@...il.com>
Fixes: 98ff4c7c8ac7 ("sfc: Separate netdev probe/remove from PCI probe/remove")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c | 6 ++--
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c | 47 +++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
index d941f073f1eb..3a06e3b1bd6b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
@@ -450,8 +450,9 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
net_dev->hw_enc_features |= efx->type->offload_features;
net_dev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG |
NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_ALL_TSO;
- netif_set_tso_max_segs(net_dev,
- ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS_DEFAULT);
+ nic_data = efx->nic_data;
+ netif_set_tso_max_size(efx->net_dev, nic_data->tso_max_payload_len);
+ netif_set_tso_max_segs(efx->net_dev, nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs);
rc = efx_ef100_init_datapath_caps(efx);
if (rc < 0)
@@ -477,7 +478,6 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
/* Don't fail init if RSS setup doesn't work. */
efx_mcdi_push_default_indir_table(efx, efx->n_rx_channels);
- nic_data = efx->nic_data;
rc = ef100_get_mac_address(efx, net_dev->perm_addr, CLIENT_HANDLE_SELF,
efx->type->is_vf);
if (rc)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
index 62e674d6ff60..3ad95a4c8af2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c
@@ -887,8 +887,7 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS:
/* We always put HDR_NUM_SEGS=1 in our TSO descriptors */
if (!reader->value) {
- netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS < 1\n");
+ pci_err(efx->pci_dev, "TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS < 1\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
@@ -901,32 +900,28 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
*/
if (!reader->value || reader->value > EFX_MIN_DMAQ_SIZE ||
EFX_MIN_DMAQ_SIZE % (u32)reader->value) {
- netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "%s size granularity is %llu, can't guarantee safety\n",
- reader->type == ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RXQ_SIZE_GRANULARITY ? "RXQ" : "TXQ",
- reader->value);
+ pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
+ "%s size granularity is %llu, can't guarantee safety\n",
+ reader->type == ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RXQ_SIZE_GRANULARITY ? "RXQ" : "TXQ",
+ reader->value);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN:
nic_data->tso_max_payload_len = min_t(u64, reader->value,
GSO_LEGACY_MAX_SIZE);
- netif_set_tso_max_size(efx->net_dev,
- nic_data->tso_max_payload_len);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_PAYLOAD_NUM_SEGS:
nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs = min_t(u64, reader->value, 0xffff);
- netif_set_tso_max_segs(efx->net_dev,
- nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_NUM_FRAMES:
nic_data->tso_max_frames = min_t(u64, reader->value, 0xffff);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_COMPAT:
if (reader->value) {
- netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "DP_COMPAT has unknown bits %#llx, driver not compatible with this hw\n",
- reader->value);
+ pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
+ "DP_COMPAT has unknown bits %#llx, driver not compatible with this hw\n",
+ reader->value);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
return 0;
@@ -946,10 +941,10 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
* So the value of this shouldn't matter.
*/
if (reader->value != ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_VI_STRIDES_DEFAULT)
- netif_dbg(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "NIC has other than default VI_STRIDES (mask "
- "%#llx), early probing might use wrong one\n",
- reader->value);
+ pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev,
+ "NIC has other than default VI_STRIDES (mask "
+ "%#llx), early probing might use wrong one\n",
+ reader->value);
return 0;
case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RX_MAX_RUNT:
/* Driver doesn't look at L2_STATUS:LEN_ERR bit, so we don't
@@ -961,9 +956,9 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx,
/* Host interface says "Drivers should ignore design parameters
* that they do not recognise."
*/
- netif_dbg(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "Ignoring unrecognised design parameter %u\n",
- reader->type);
+ pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev,
+ "Ignoring unrecognised design parameter %u\n",
+ reader->type);
return 0;
}
}
@@ -999,13 +994,13 @@ static int ef100_check_design_params(struct efx_nic *efx)
*/
if (reader.state != EF100_TLV_TYPE) {
if (reader.state == EF100_TLV_TYPE_CONT)
- netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "truncated design parameter (incomplete type %u)\n",
- reader.type);
+ pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
+ "truncated design parameter (incomplete type %u)\n",
+ reader.type);
else
- netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
- "truncated design parameter %u\n",
- reader.type);
+ pci_err(efx->pci_dev,
+ "truncated design parameter %u\n",
+ reader.type);
rc = -EIO;
}
out:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists