netdev - Re: [PATCH v11 6/8] MAINTAINERS: rust: Add new sections for DELAY/SLEEP and TIMEKEEPING API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250402.231627.270393242231849699.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 23:16:27 +0900 (JST)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: a.hindborg@...nel.org, fujita.tomonori@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
 tmgross@...ch.edu, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
 gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
 a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
 frederic@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, jstultz@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
 vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com,
 tgunders@...hat.com, me@...enk.dev, david.laight.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/8] MAINTAINERS: rust: Add new sections for
 DELAY/SLEEP and TIMEKEEPING API

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:03:15 -0700
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:

>> My recommendation would be to take all of `rust/kernel/time` under one
>> entry for now. I suggest the following, folding in the hrtimer entry as
>> well:
>> 
>> DELAY, SLEEP, TIMEKEEPING, TIMERS [RUST]
>> M:	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
> 
> Given you're the one who would handle the patches, I think this make
> more sense.
> 
>> R:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
>> R:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
> 
> Tomo, does this look good to you?

Fine by me.

So a single entry for all the Rust time stuff, which isn't aligned
with C's MAINTAINERS entries. It's just for now?


>> R:	Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
>> R:	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>> R:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> R:	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
>> R:	John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
> 
> We should add:
> 
> R:      Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> 
> If Stephen is not against it.
> 
>> L:	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
>> S:	Supported
>> W:	https://rust-for-linux.com
>> B:	https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues
>> T:	git https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux.git rust-timekeeping-next
>> F:	rust/kernel/time.rs
>> F:	rust/kernel/time/
>> 
>> If that is acceptable to everyone, it is very likely that I can pick 2-6
>> for v6.16.
>> 
> 
> You will need to fix something because patch 2-6 removes `Ktime` ;-)

I'll take care of it in the next version.

>> I assume patch 1 will go through the sched/core tree, and then Miguel
>> can pick 7.
>> 
> 
> Patch 1 & 7 probably should go together, but we can decide it later.

Since nothing has moved forward for quite a while, maybe it's time to
drop patch 1.