[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67ee98cd6c179_136b7c294e1@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:18:53 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Matt Moeller <moeller.matt@...il.com>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: support SKF_NET_OFF and SKF_LL_OFF on skb
frags
Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
>
> Classic BPF socket filters with SKB_NET_OFF and SKB_LL_OFF fail to
> read when these offsets extend into frags.
>
> This has been observed with iwlwifi and reproduced with tun with
> IFF_NAPI_FRAGS. The below straightforward socket filter on UDP port,
> applied to a RAW socket, will silently miss matching packets.
>
> const int offset_proto = offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_nxt);
> const int offset_dport = sizeof(struct ip6_hdr) + offsetof(struct udphdr, dest);
> struct sock_filter filter_code[] = {
> BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_B + BPF_ABS, SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PKTTYPE),
> BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, PACKET_HOST, 0, 4),
> BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_B + BPF_ABS, SKF_NET_OFF + offset_proto),
> BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, IPPROTO_UDP, 0, 2),
> BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_H + BPF_ABS, SKF_NET_OFF + offset_dport),
>
> This is unexpected behavior. Socket filter programs should be
> consistent regardless of environment. Silent misses are
> particularly concerning as hard to detect.
>
> Use skb_copy_bits for offsets outside linear, same as done for
> non-SKF_(LL|NET) offsets.
>
> Offset is always positive after subtracting the reference threshold
> SKB_(LL|NET)_OFF, so is always >= skb_(mac|network)_offset. The sum of
> the two is an offset against skb->data, and may be negative, but it
> cannot point before skb->head, as skb_(mac|network)_offset would too.
>
> This appears to go back to when frag support was introduced to
> sk_run_filter in linux-2.4.4, before the introduction of git.
>
> The amount of code change and 8/16/32 bit duplication are unfortunate.
> But any attempt I made to be smarter saved very few LoC while
> complicating the code.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250122200402.3461154-1-maze@google.com/
Let me respond here to the earlier comments in that thread, rather than reopen that.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/4a6be957-f932-426a-99bf-7209620f8fa9@iogearbox.net/
As Daniel suggests, a developer can work around the issue in a variety
of ways. And that is what this customer does in the short term. Avoid
SKF_NET_OFF.
But I think this does need to be addressed. SKF_NET_OFF doing what you
expect in many cases, but silently missing matches in some, is just
dangerous. It's not hard to fix: just use skb_copy_bits, like we also
do for regular positive offsets.
The specific instance is due to attaching a filter in the L3 layer,
while inspecting a transport header that will only get pulled by the
L4 layer. Pulling these headers in device drivers is a non-starter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists