[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67f452784b16c_3bfc832946d@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 18:32:24 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] udp_tunnel: use static call for GRO hooks
when possible
Paolo Abeni wrote:
> It's quite common to have a single UDP tunnel type active in the
> whole system. In such a case we can replace the indirect call for
> the UDP tunnel GRO callback with a static call.
>
> Add the related accounting in the control path and switch to static
> call when possible. To keep the code simple use a static array for
> the registered tunnel types, and size such array based on the kernel
> config.
>
> Note that there are valid kernel configurations leading to
> UDP_MAX_TUNNEL_TYPES == 0 even with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_UDP_TUNNEL),
> Explicitly skip the accounting in such a case, to avoid compile warning
> when accessing "udp_tunnel_gro_types".
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists