[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250408155844.30790-1-mpazdan@arista.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 15:54:14 +0000
From: Marek Pazdan <mpazdan@...sta.com>
To: kory.maincent@...tlin.com
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
almasrymina@...gle.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
daniel.zahka@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
gal@...dia.com,
horms@...nel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
jianbol@...dia.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mpazdan@...sta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] ethtool: transceiver reset and presence pin control
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 15:32:03 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote:
> ETHTOOL_PHY_G/STUNABLE IOCTLs are targeting the PHY of the NIC but IIUC in your
> case you are targeting the reset of the QSFP module. Maybe phylink API is more
> appropriate for this feature.
>
> You have to add net-next prefix in the subject like this [PATCH net-next 1/2]
> when you add new support to net subsystem.
Thanks for review.
>From up to now replies I see that there are concerns regarding usage phy-tunable ethtool
option for this purpose, so I will post updated patches after we clarify proper way to go.
I need to check more on phylink API, from the overview I read:
"phylink is a mechanism to support hot-pluggable networking modules directly connected
to a MAC without needing to re-initialise the adapter on hot-plug events.
phylink supports conventional phylib-based setups, fixed link setups
and SFP (Small Formfactor Pluggable) modules at present."
I don't see QSFP modules are being supported but I need to verify impact of this.
As I mentioned in other reply this API should allow for transceiver module reset
from user space if orchestration agent detects transceiver failure state or when
it gets direct request from Cli.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists