netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Fix netns UAF introduced by commit 1be52169c348

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250408055830.GA708@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 07:58:30 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, gechangzhong@...tc.cn, kbusch@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sagi@...mberg.me, shaopeijie@...tc.cn,
	zhang.guanghui@...tc.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Fix netns UAF introduced by commit
 1be52169c348

On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:55:27PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Which branch/tag should be based on, for-next or nvme-6.15 ?
> http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git

nvme-6.15 is the canonical tree, but for bug fixes I'm fine with
almost anything :)