lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df253016-81df-4cc9-8a8c-f92fd1cb8aea@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:18:26 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
 steven.price@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] configs/debug: run and debug PREEMPT

Hi Stanislav,

On 02/04/2025 19:23, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Recent change [0] resulted in a "BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in
> preemptible" splat [1]. PREEMPT kernels have additional requirements
> on what can and can not run with/without preemption enabled.
> Expose those constrains in the debug kernels.

Good idea to suggest this to find more bugs!

I did some quick tests on my side with our CI, and the MPTCP selftests
seem to take a bit more time, but without impacting the results.
Hopefully, there will be no impact in slower/busy environments :)

Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ