netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 11/11] idpf: add support for Rx timestamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b0bcabf6-d010-46df-81ce-f986af868faa@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:31:51 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@...gle.com>, Mina Almasry
	<almasrymina@...gle.com>, Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 11/11] idpf: add support
 for Rx timestamping



On 4/8/2025 3:31 AM, Milena Olech wrote:
> Add Rx timestamp function when the Rx timestamp value is read directly
> from the Rx descriptor. In order to extend the Rx timestamp value to 64
> bit in hot path, the PHC time is cached in the receive groups.
> Add supported Rx timestamp modes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>
> Tested-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Samuel Salin <Samuel.salin@...el.com>
> ---
Besides my question in 10/11 about the timestamp extension logic, this
looks ok to me.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>