[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_Wu9EDZM9jvmgAU@lore-desk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 01:19:16 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: airoha: Add L2 hw acceleration support
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:18:32PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Similar to mtk driver, introduce the capability to offload L2 traffic
> > defining flower rules in the PSE/PPE engine available on EN7581 SoC.
> > Since the hw always reports L2/L3/L4 flower rules, link all L2 rules
> > sharing the same L2 info (with different L3/L4 info) in the L2 subflows
> > list of a given L2 PPE entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h | 11 ++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_ppe.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > +static void airoha_ppe_foe_remove_flow(struct airoha_ppe *ppe,
> > + struct airoha_flow_table_entry *e)
> > +{
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&ppe_lock);
> > +
> > + hlist_del_init(&e->list);
> > + if (e->hash != 0xffff) {
> > + e->data.ib1 &= ~AIROHA_FOE_IB1_BIND_STATE;
> > + e->data.ib1 |= FIELD_PREP(AIROHA_FOE_IB1_BIND_STATE,
> > + AIROHA_FOE_STATE_INVALID);
> > + airoha_ppe_foe_commit_entry(ppe, &e->data, e->hash);
> > + e->hash = 0xffff;
> > + }
> > + if (e->type == FLOW_TYPE_L2_SUBFLOW) {
> > + hlist_del_init(&e->l2_subflow_node);
> > + kfree(e);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void airoha_ppe_foe_remove_l2_flow(struct airoha_ppe *ppe,
> > + struct airoha_flow_table_entry *e)
> > +{
> > + struct hlist_head *head = &e->l2_flows;
> > + struct hlist_node *n;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&ppe_lock);
> > +
> > + rhashtable_remove_fast(&ppe->l2_flows, &e->l2_node,
> > + airoha_l2_flow_table_params);
> > + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(e, n, head, l2_subflow_node)
> > + airoha_ppe_foe_remove_flow(ppe, e);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void airoha_ppe_foe_flow_remove_entry(struct airoha_ppe *ppe,
> > struct airoha_flow_table_entry *e)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_held(&ppe_lock);
> >
> > - if (e->type == FLOW_TYPE_L2) {
> > - rhashtable_remove_fast(&ppe->l2_flows, &e->l2_node,
> > - airoha_l2_flow_table_params);
> > - } else {
> > - hlist_del_init(&e->list);
> > - if (e->hash != 0xffff) {
> > - e->data.ib1 &= ~AIROHA_FOE_IB1_BIND_STATE;
> > - e->data.ib1 |= FIELD_PREP(AIROHA_FOE_IB1_BIND_STATE,
> > - AIROHA_FOE_STATE_INVALID);
> > - airoha_ppe_foe_commit_entry(ppe, &e->data, e->hash);
> > - e->hash = 0xffff;
> > - }
> > - }
> > + if (e->type == FLOW_TYPE_L2)
> > + airoha_ppe_foe_remove_l2_flow(ppe, e);
> > + else
> > + airoha_ppe_foe_remove_flow(ppe, e);
>
> It's not a hard request, more of a question: wouldn't it be better to
> introduce "airoha_ppe_foe_remove_l2_flow()" and
> "airoha_ppe_foe_remove_flow()" in the patch #2?
> It looks like reorganizing the code can be part of the preliminary
> patch and the current patch can just add the feature, e.g. L2_SUBFLOW.
ack, fine for me. I will fix it in v2.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists