[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94c8e113c11ec18c5e9330d7f2175a4469518e44.camel@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 00:54:39 +0000
From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>
To: "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"rds-devel@....oracle.com" <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rds: rely on IB/core to determine if device is
ODP capable
On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 22:11 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:38:14AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 03:34:13PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:23:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:04:55PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/net/rds/ib.c b/net/rds/ib.c
> > > > > index 9826fe7f9d00..c62aa2ff4963 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/rds/ib.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/rds/ib.c
> > > > > @@ -153,14 +153,6 @@ static int rds_ib_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
> > > > > rds_ibdev->max_wrs = device->attrs.max_qp_wr;
> > > > > rds_ibdev->max_sge = min(device->attrs.max_send_sge, RDS_IB_MAX_SGE);
> > > > >
> > > > > - rds_ibdev->odp_capable =
> > > > > - !!(device->attrs.kernel_cap_flags &
> > > > > - IBK_ON_DEMAND_PAGING) &&
> > > > > - !!(device->attrs.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.rc_odp_caps &
> > > > > - IB_ODP_SUPPORT_WRITE) &&
> > > > > - !!(device->attrs.odp_caps.per_transport_caps.rc_odp_caps &
> > > > > - IB_ODP_SUPPORT_READ);
> > > >
> > > > This patch seems to drop the check for WRITE and READ support on the
> > > > ODP.
> > >
> > > Right, and they are part of IBK_ON_DEMAND_PAGING support. All ODP
> > > providers support both IB_ODP_SUPPORT_WRITE and IB_ODP_SUPPORT_READ.
> >
> > Where? mlx5 reads this from FW and I don't see anything blocking
> > IBK_ON_DEMAND_PAGING if the FW is weird.
>
> As the one who added it, I can assure you that we added these checks not
> because of weird FW, but because these caps existed.
Hi Leon,
Thanks for the patch. Is there a commit id for the FW checks we can see? Maybe we can just add a little more detail to
the commit description to make clear where they are and what they're checking for. Thank you!
Allison
>
> RDS calls to ib_reg_user_mr() with the following access_flags.
>
> 564 int access_flags =
> 565 (IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ |
> 566 IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC |
> 567 IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND);
> <...>
> 575
> 576 ib_mr = ib_reg_user_mr(rds_ibdev->pd, start, length, virt_addr,
> 577 access_flags);
>
> If for some reason ODP doesn't support WRITE and/or READ, ib_reg_user_mr() will return an error from FW,
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists