[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2da3c572-cda8-4879-b67f-b8ff44ddec8c@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:58:54 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<yuyanghuang@...gle.com>, <sdf@...ichev.me>, <gnault@...hat.com>,
<nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, <petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/13] tools: ynl-gen: consider dump ops without
a do "type-consistent"
On 4/9/2025 6:52 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 13:38:01 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
>>> # 'do' and 'dump' response parsing is identical
>>> self.type_consistent = True
>>> + self.type_onside = False
>>
>> I'm not understanding what type_onside is meant to mean.
>
> Damn, I have fallen into the IDE auto-completion trap.
> It was supposed to say "oneside".
> Not that the solution is super clean either way :(
Lol.. I saw this and read it as "type_oneside" myself.. didn't even
notice the typo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists