lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7b1f5de-7003-4960-a9d1-883bf2f1aa77@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:02:27 +0700
From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx

On 4/9/25 13:44, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> On 4/8/25 14:34, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:27 AM Bui Quang Minh 
>> <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/25 08:03, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>>>> On Fri,  4 Apr 2025 16:39:03 +0700, Bui Quang Minh 
>>>> <minhquangbui99@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
>>>>> napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. In delayed 
>>>>> refill_work, it
>>>>> also calls napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. This can 
>>>>> leads to
>>>>> deadlock when napi_disable() is called on an already disabled 
>>>>> napi. This
>>>>> scenario can be reproducible by binding a XDP socket to virtio-net
>>>>> interface without setting up the fill ring. As a result, 
>>>>> try_fill_recv
>>>>> will fail until the fill ring is set up and refill_work is scheduled.
>>>> So, what is the problem? The refill_work is waiting? As I know, 
>>>> that thread
>>>> will sleep some time, so the cpu can do other work.
>>> When napi_disable is called on an already disabled napi, it will sleep
>>> in napi_disable_locked while still holding the netdev_lock. As a 
>>> result,
>>> later napi_enable gets stuck too as it cannot acquire the netdev_lock.
>>> This leads to refill_work and the pause-then-resume tx are stuck 
>>> altogether.
>> This needs to be added to the chagelog. And it looks like this is a 
>> fix for
>>
>> commit 413f0271f3966e0c73d4937963f19335af19e628
>> Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> Date:   Tue Jan 14 19:53:14 2025 -0800
>>
>>      net: protect NAPI enablement with netdev_lock()
>>
>> ?
>
> I'm not aware of this, will update the fix tags in the next patch.
>
>> I wonder if it's simpler to just hold the netdev lock in resize or xsk
>> binding instead of this.
>
> That looks cleaner, let me try that approach.

We need to hold the netdev_lock in the refill work too. Otherwise, we 
get this race

refill_work                                xdp bind
napi_disable()

                                             netdev_lock(dev)
                                             napi_disable_locked() <- hang
napi_enable() <- cannot acquire the lock


I don't like the idea to hold netdev_lock in refill_work. I will reply 
with the patch for you to review.

Thanks,
Quang Minh.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ