[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250410112350.7dbb299c@wsk>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:23:50 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 5/5] ARM: mxs_defconfig: Enable
CONFIG_FEC_MTIP_L2SW to support MTIP L2 switch
Hi Krzysztof,
> On 10/04/2025 09:01, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >>
> >> Am 07.04.25 um 16:51 schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
> >>> This patch enables support for More Than IP switch available on
> >>> some imx28[7] devices.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
> >> thanks adding the driver to mxs_defconfig. Unfortunately it's not
> >> possible for reviewers to identify the relevant changes,
> >
> > Could you be more specific here?
> > As fair as I see - there is only 14 LOCs changed for review.
>
> Really, the comment was very specific. You make multiple independent,
> looking irrelevant changes to the file.
>
> >
> > Please also be aware that MTIP L2 switch driver has some
> > dependencies - on e.g. SWITCHDEV and BRIDGE, which had to be
> > enabled to allow the former one to be active.
> >
> >> also the
> >> commit messages doesn't provide further information.
> >>
> >
> > What kind of extra information shall I provide? IMHO the patch is
> > self-explaining.
>
> For example explain why do you think GPIO_SYSFS should be dropped.
>
> >
> >> In general there are two approaches to solves this:
> >> 1) prepend an additional patch which synchronizes mxs_defconfig
> >> with current mainline
> >> 2) manually create the relevant changes against mxs_defconfig
> >>
> >> The decision about the approaches is up to the maintainer.
> >
> > I took the linux-next's (or net-next) mxs defconfig (cp it to be
> > .config)
> >
> > Then run CROSS_COMPILE= ... make ARCH=arm menuconfig
> > Enabled all the relevant Kconfig options and run
> >
> > CROSS_COMPILE= ... make ARCH=arm savedefconfig
> > and copy defconfig to mxs_defconfig.
> > Then I used git to prepare the patch.
> >
> > Isn't the above procedure correct?
>
> No, it is not correct. Do not make any changes in the "Enabled all the
> relevant Kconfig options and run" step and check the result. Do you
> see difference in result file? If yes, then why such difference
> should be part of this commit?
Ok, I get your point. Then I shall prepare a separate, pre-patch.
Thanks for info.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@...x.de
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists