netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] rxrpc: rxgk: Provide infrastructure and key derivation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250410163121.04d56770@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:31:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Christian
 Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
 linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu
 <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] rxrpc: rxgk: Provide infrastructure
 and key derivation

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 07:54:09 +0100 David Howells wrote:
> Good catch, thanks.  That path should never trigger, but it should really do
> "ret = -EINVAL; goto out;".
> 
> Do you want me to respin the patches or follow up with a fix patch?

Sorry for the delay. I was hoping you could respin and maybe fix/give
up on the annotation in patch 3? Right now patch 3 gets flagged as 
a build warning which terminates the CI processing before we get to
make htmldocs. And it would be nice to get that run given patch 1.