[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_cy8OLV4ZABRSrA@fedora>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:54:40 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] bonding: Mark active offloaded
xfrm_states
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:41:32PM +0300, Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> When the active link is changed for a bond device, the existing xfrm
> states need to be migrated over to the new link. This is done with:
> - bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() goes through the offloaded states list and
> removes all of them from hw.
> - bond_ipsec_add_sa_all() re-offloads all states to the new device.
>
> But because the offload status of xfrm states isn't marked in any way,
> there can be bugs.
>
> When all bond links are down, bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() unoffloads
> everything from the previous active link. If the same link then comes
> back up, nothing gets reoffloaded by bond_ipsec_add_sa_all().
> This results in a stack trace like this a bit later when user space
> removes the offloaded rules, because mlx5e_xfrm_del_state() is asked to
> remove a rule that's no longer offloaded:
>
> [] Call Trace:
> [] <TASK>
> [] ? __warn+0x7d/0x110
> [] ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0x90/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
> [] ? report_bug+0x16d/0x180
> [] ? handle_bug+0x4f/0x90
> [] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
> [] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
> [] ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0x73/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
> [] ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0x90/0xa0 [mlx5_core]
> [] bond_ipsec_del_sa+0x1ab/0x200 [bonding]
> [] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x1f/0x60
> [] __xfrm_state_delete+0x196/0x200
> [] xfrm_state_delete+0x21/0x40
> [] xfrm_del_sa+0x69/0x110
> [] xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x300
> [] ? release_pages+0xca/0x140
> [] ? copy_to_user_tmpl.part.0+0x110/0x110
> [] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
> [] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x31/0x40
> [] netlink_unicast+0x1fc/0x2d0
> [] netlink_sendmsg+0x1e4/0x410
> [] __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
> [] sock_write_iter+0x94/0xf0
> [] vfs_write+0x338/0x3f0
> [] ksys_write+0xba/0xd0
> [] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x100
> [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
>
> There's also another theoretical bug:
> Calling bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() multiple times can result in corruption
> in the driver implementation if the double-free isn't tolerated. This
> isn't nice.
>
> Before the "Fixes" commit, xs->xso.real_dev was set to NULL when an xfrm
> state was unoffloaded from a device, but a race with netdevsim's
> .xdo_dev_offload_ok() accessing real_dev was considered a sufficient
> reason to not set real_dev to NULL anymore. This unfortunately
> introduced the new bugs.
>
> Since .xdo_dev_offload_ok() was significantly refactored by [1] and
> there are no more users in the stack of xso.real_dev, that
> race is now gone and xs->xso.real_dev can now once again be used to
> represent which device (if any) currently holds the offloaded rule.
>
> Go one step further and set real_dev after add/before delete calls, to
> catch any future driver misuses of real_dev.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1739972570.git.leon@kernel.org/
> Fixes: f8cde9805981 ("bonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference")
> Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 4ba525a564c5..14f7c9712ad4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -496,9 +496,9 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct net_device *bond_dev,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
> err = real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(real_dev, xs, extack);
> if (!err) {
> + xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
> ipsec->xs = xs;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipsec->list);
> mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> @@ -540,12 +540,12 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev)
> continue;
>
> - ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
> if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(real_dev,
> ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
> slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
> - ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> + continue;
> }
> + ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
> }
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> @@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> __func__);
> continue;
> }
> + ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(real_dev,
> ipsec->xs);
> if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> @@ -664,6 +665,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>
> WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
>
> + xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(real_dev, xs);
> --
> 2.45.0
>
Tested-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists