[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<174436263279.184109.16205129107386423128.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:10:32 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: stm32: simplify clock handling
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 20:15:35 +0100 you wrote:
> Some stm32 implementations need the receive clock running in suspend,
> as indicated by dwmac->ops->clk_rx_enable_in_suspend. The existing
> code achieved this in a rather complex way, by passing a flag around.
>
> However, the clk API prepare/enables are counted - which means that a
> clock won't be stopped as long as there are more prepare and enables
> than disables and unprepares, just like a reference count.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: stmmac: stm32: simplify clock handling
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/61499764e5cc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists