[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250411145734.GH395307@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:57:34 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Abdun Nihaal <abdun.nihaal@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>,
Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: fix memory leak in
cxgb4_init_ethtool_filters() error path
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:47:46PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
> > @@ -2270,6 +2270,7 @@ int cxgb4_init_ethtool_filters(struct adapter *adap)
> > eth_filter->port[i].bmap = bitmap_zalloc(nentries, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!eth_filter->port[i].bmap) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + kvfree(eth_filter->port[i].loc_array);
> > goto free_eth_finfo;
> > }
> > }
>
> How do you think about to move the shown error code assignment behind the mentioned label
> (so that another bit of duplicate source code could be avoided)?
Hi Markus,
If you mean something like the following. Then I agree that it
is both in keeping with the existing error handling in this function
and addresses the problem at hand.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
index 7f3f5afa864f..df26d3388c00 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
@@ -2270,13 +2270,15 @@ int cxgb4_init_ethtool_filters(struct adapter *adap)
eth_filter->port[i].bmap = bitmap_zalloc(nentries, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!eth_filter->port[i].bmap) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto free_eth_finfo;
+ goto free_eth_finfo_loc_array;
}
}
adap->ethtool_filters = eth_filter;
return 0;
+free_eth_finfo_loc_array:
+ kvfree(eth_filter->port[i].loc_array);
free_eth_finfo:
while (i-- > 0) {
bitmap_free(eth_filter->port[i].bmap);
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists