[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z/lFQ85vhSQiFDBm@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 00:37:23 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, jk@...abs.org, joel@....id.au,
eajames@...ux.ibm.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
awalls@...metrocast.net, hverkuil@...all.nl,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
louis.peens@...igine.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, yury.norov@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, pgaj@...ence.com, hpa@...or.com,
alistair@...ple.id.au, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw, Frank.Li@....com,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
david.laight.linux@...il.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] media: pci: cx18-av-vbi: Replace open-coded
parity calculation with parity_odd()
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 07:08:58AM +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On April 10, 2025 12:06:52 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 20:43 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > >
> > > This is orthogonal to the change to parity_odd() though. More specific
> > > to the new parity_odd() you can now do following as parity_odd()
> > > argument is u64:
> > >
> > > err = !parity_odd(*(u16 *)p);
> >
> > Can it though? Need to be careful with alignment with that, I'd think.
>
> My bad. You are absolutely right.
>
Then maybe we can still go with:
err = !parity_odd(p[0] ^ p[1]);
I believe this should still be a fairly safe approach?
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists