[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250411023702.62614-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:36:51 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, <jdamato@...tly.com>,
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<sdf@...ichev.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:10:28 -0700
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:10:01 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > syzkaller reported splats in register_netdevice() and
> > unregister_netdevice_many_notify().
> >
> > In register_netdevice(), some devices cannot use
> > netdev_assert_locked().
> >
> > In unregister_netdevice_many_notify(), maybe we need to
> > hold ops lock in UNREGISTER as you initially suggested.
> > Now do_setlink() deadlock does not happen.
>
> Ah... Thank you.
>
> Do you have a reference to use as Reported-by, or its from a
> non-public instance ?
It's from private instance on my EC2, so
Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
would be fine unless Eric can release a public report from syzbot
if exists.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists