[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250411040907.87007-1-xiafei_xupt@163.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:09:07 +0800
From: lvxiafei <xiafei_xupt@....com>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: coreteam@...filter.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
horms@...nel.org,
kadlec@...filter.org,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvxiafei@...setime.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
pablo@...filter.org,
xiafei_xupt@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] netfilter: netns nf_conntrack: per-netns net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_max sysctl
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > You can make an initial patch that replaces all occurences of
> > nf_conntrack_max with cnet->sysctl_conntrack_max
>
> Something like this:
> ...
Agreed, I can submit the changes later.
First of all, a patch should do one thing clearly,
which is convenient for maintainers to review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists